Prashant Kishor Raises Doubts Over Bihar Election Results, Calls Outcome ‘Suspicious’ Despite No Proof
Patna, Nov 23— Political strategist-turned-activist Prashant Kishor has sparked debate after questioning the outcome of the recently concluded Bihar assembly elections, where his outfit Jan Suraaj failed to win a single seat despite contesting nearly all constituencies. Kishor suggested that the poll results appeared “rigged,” although he admitted he had no concrete evidence to support the claim.
Kishor’s remarks add to the growing chorus of allegations from Congress and RJD, who have also raised doubts over the voting process and final tally. The unexpected performance of several lesser-known parties and unusually high vote margins have triggered discussion across political circles and among voters.
Kishor Flags ‘Invisible Forces’ and Unusual Voting Patterns
Speaking to a news channel, Kishor said that certain results “did not add up,” pointing out that unfamiliar parties with barely recognised symbols secured more than 100,000 votes in some constituencies. He described the situation as one influenced by “invisible forces,” suggesting that the numbers appeared inconsistent with ground feedback during campaigning.
He highlighted three key concerns:
The sudden rise in voter turnout at the last moment
The delay in releasing detailed polling data
The unexpected uniformity in vote counts of winning NDA candidates
Kishor expressed shock that both Deputy Chief Ministers Samrat Choudhary and Vijay Kumar Sinha received almost identical vote totals — 1,22,480 and 1,22,408 respectively — calling it statistically unusual.
Cash Influence and Fear Factor Among Voters, Says Kishor
Reflecting on Jan Suraaj’s poor performance, Kishor identified three major reasons:
Heavy distribution of ₹10,000 cash to 60,000–62,000 women voters per constituency
Fear among voters that a split mandate could bring back what they described as “Jungle Raj” under RJD
Unexplainable “unseen interference” in voting trends
Kishor also raised concerns about money power influencing democracy, saying this was perhaps the first time such large-scale cash incentive allegations surfaced during an Indian election.
Opposition Calls for Answers, EC Yet to Respond
Kishor urged the Election Commission, opposition parties, and civil society to examine whether elections held under such circumstances could be considered fair. He clarified that he was not alleging EVM manipulation directly, but questioned whether voter influence and procedural opacity could compromise democratic integrity.
Opposition parties in Bihar have echoed similar concerns, demanding transparency, constituency-wise data logs, and audit trails of electronic voting.
Conclusion
The remarks have triggered fresh speculation around Bihar’s mandate, especially after an unexpected sweep by the NDA alliance. While Kishor admits he cannot prove wrongdoing, his observations have renewed public discussion on electoral practices, voter behaviour, and trust in polling systems.
Final Thoughts from TheTrendingPeople.com
A democratic mandate depends not only on votes cast, but on the confidence citizens hold in the process that counts them. Prashant Kishor’s concerns reflect a growing anxiety around electoral transparency, money power, and shifting voting patterns in Bihar. As calls for clarity rise, the coming days will determine whether the Election Commission addresses these doubts or whether the political conversation continues to deepen without answers.