Rajya Sabha Adjourned Amid Protests Over Bihar Electoral Roll Revisions

Opposition Raises Alarm Over Disenfranchisement, Disrupts Proceedings for Second Day

New Delhi, Aug 8 (TheTrendingPeople.com) — The Rajya Sabha was adjourned till Monday following persistent disruptions by Opposition members demanding a debate on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar. The session witnessed vociferous protests, repeated slogans, and a strong push by Opposition leaders who claim the revision exercise could lead to disenfranchisement of marginalized communities.

The disruption marks yet another day of parliamentary gridlock during the ongoing Monsoon Session, highlighting the deepening political divide over electoral processes and democratic safeguards.

What Triggered the Protests?

The heart of the conflict lies in the Election Commission of India’s (ECI) decision to carry out a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls in Bihar ahead of the upcoming 2025 assembly elections.

Opposition leaders argue that the move:

• Lacks sufficient transparency.
• Could result in the mass deletion of legitimate voters, especially among migrant workers, minorities, and marginalized castes.
• Is being carried out without proper consultation with stakeholders.

The fears were compounded by reports alleging the disproportionate exclusion of Bengali-speaking migrant laborers and other underprivileged communities from the voter list.

Deputy Chairman Rejects 28 Rule 267 Notices

The day began with Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairman Harivansh rejecting 28 notices under Rule 267 of the House rules, which allows for the suspension of listed business to discuss matters of urgent national importance.

Among the rejected topics were:

• The SIR exercise in Bihar,
• Alleged discrimination against Bengali migrant workers,
• Several social and economic issues raised by various Opposition MPs.

Harivansh cited precedents set by previous Chairpersons, including M. Venkaiah Naidu, to justify the rejection. This led to immediate uproar from Opposition leaders, including:

• Derek O’Brien (TMC),
• Tiruchi Siva (DMK),
• John Brittas (CPI-M), who even suggested scrapping Rule 267 altogether due to its frequent rejection by the Chair.

"Vote Ki Chori Band Karo": Slogans Echo in Rajya Sabha

When the House reconvened post-noon, BJP MP Ghanshyam Tiwari was in the Chair. He reminded members of a 1985 directive that prohibits the display of badges, placards, or any symbols within the chamber. He also declined to entertain points of order during Question Hour, urging MPs to maintain decorum.

Despite his repeated calls for order, Opposition MPs shouted slogans, demanding justice and electoral transparency. The chants of
"Vote ki chori band karo" (Stop stealing votes) rang loudly across the chamber.

Minister of State for Food Processing Industries, Ravneet Singh, who was scheduled to respond to questions, quipped:

“First, all these ‘chor machaye shor’ must be asked to sit and maintain order.”

Ultimately, unable to restore calm, Tiwari adjourned the House for the day.

Background: What Is the Special Intensive Revision (SIR)?

The Special Intensive Revision is an electoral roll revision exercise conducted by the Election Commission of India in states or regions where special circumstances arise — such as high migration, internal displacement, or notable demographic changes.

The SIR is intended to ensure accuracy and prevent electoral fraud. However, Opposition parties in Bihar argue that:

• The process is non-transparent.
• Many legitimate voters were either not notified or were wrongly marked for deletion.
• The revision lacks mechanisms for timely correction or appeals.

In recent weeks, civil society groups have also raised red flags over the possibility of politically motivated purging of voter lists, particularly in sensitive constituencies.

A Pattern of Disruption: Monsoon Session in Disarray

This is not the first time the Monsoon Session has faced disruption. Over the last week, both Houses of Parliament have seen repeated adjournments, with key legislative business left pending.

Among the pressing issues awaiting debate:

• The Data Protection Bill,
• Women's Reservation Bill (still pending broader consensus),
• Multiple reports from standing committees.

The deadlock over the SIR issue is now symptomatic of a larger institutional fatigue, with parties increasingly resorting to protests inside Parliament instead of negotiated floor strategies.

What the Opposition Demands

Opposition parties under the INDIA bloc (Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance) have demanded:

• A full-scale discussion on the SIR process in Bihar.
• A stay on the revision until transparency and fair process are ensured.
• An independent audit of deleted voter entries.
• Greater involvement of civil society and regional leaders in verifying the draft rolls.

They have further alleged that the ECI’s independence is being compromised, and that the SIR is an indirect attempt to manipulate electoral outcomes in favour of the ruling party.

Government's Response

The BJP-led government has rejected these allegations, maintaining that:

• The SIR is a routine administrative measure.
• Due process is being followed under ECI supervision.
• There is no political interference in the deletion or addition of voter names.

A senior government official remarked,

“This is a case of manufactured panic. Every voter has the right to appeal if their name is wrongly deleted.”

However, so far, no formal debate has been allowed on the issue in either House.

Implications for Electoral Democracy

The events unfolding in Parliament are not just about procedural disputes. They strike at the core of India's democratic system — the right to vote.

Experts warn that:

• If disenfranchisement allegations are true, they could undermine trust in electoral institutions.
• Parliamentary deadlocks affect the passage of key laws and budgets.
• Constant adjournments signal a breakdown in floor management, both by the ruling party and the Opposition.

Dr. Anupama Sen, a political analyst at the Indian Institute of Public Affairs, told TheTrendingPeople:

“The disenfranchisement debate deserves open, transparent discussion — not gag orders. Parliament must reclaim its deliberative role.”

What’s Next?

With the House set to reconvene at 11 a.m. on Monday, it remains to be seen whether any middle ground can be achieved.

Key watchpoints include:

• Will the Chair allow a structured debate under a different rule?
• Will the Election Commission issue clarifications or revise its SIR strategy?
• Will the Opposition escalate its protests into a coordinated walkout?

---

Final Thoughts from TheTrendingPeople.com

The current standoff in Parliament over the electoral roll revision in Bihar is a stark reminder that electoral integrity cannot be compromised in a democracy. The Election Commission, Parliament, and political parties must uphold transparency, inclusivity, and fairness — not just in process, but also in perception.

Without mutual respect for procedure and dissent, the very foundations of our democratic institutions risk erosion. It’s time for Parliament to pause the politics and prioritize the people’s voice.