Ajit Pawar’s Death Set to Reshape Maharashtra Politics, Triggers Power Struggle Within NCP
The sudden death of Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) leader Ajit Pawar has sent shockwaves through Maharashtra’s political landscape, creating uncertainty over leadership, alliance stability, and control of key government portfolios.
Feared by rivals for his sharp political instincts and admired by supporters for his grassroots strength, Pawar was widely regarded as the most powerful strategist within the NCP — even without holding the party’s top post. His passing now leaves a major vacuum in the state’s power structure.
Pawar died on January 28 in an aircraft crash near Baramati airport while travelling from Mumbai to campaign for the ongoing Zilla Parishad elections. Six others, including crew members, were also on board.
A Leader Rooted in Baramati
Ironically, Pawar’s final journey ended near Baramati, the political stronghold that shaped his career and identity.
Known locally as “Dada”, he built his influence through decades of close engagement with farmers, cooperatives, and grassroots organisations. Baramati remained both his political base and emotional anchor.
Political observers note that few leaders in Maharashtra maintained such deep local connections while operating at the highest levels of state power.
The NCP’s Master Strategist
Though he never held the party presidency, Ajit Pawar functioned as the NCP’s principal power broker.
He played a central role in:
- Negotiating coalition arrangements
- Managing internal party conflicts
- Securing crucial ministries
- Mobilising election machinery
His reputation for bold political manoeuvres — including sudden shifts in alliances — made him one of the most unpredictable figures in state politics.
Colleagues often described him as a leader who could disappear without notice during high-pressure moments, only to return with decisive strategies.
Impact on Government Stability
Pawar’s death is expected to have immediate consequences for the ruling coalition.
As one of the key negotiators between alliance partners, he helped maintain balance among competing interests. His absence raises questions about:
- Continuity in coalition coordination
- Stability of ministerial arrangements
- Control over the finance and development portfolios
- Future electoral strategies
Sources within the alliance say informal talks have already begun over leadership redistribution.
Internal Power Struggle Likely
Within the NCP, Pawar’s departure opens the door to intense internal competition.
Several senior leaders are now expected to seek greater influence, particularly over:
- Party organisation
- Candidate selection
- Fundraising networks
- Policy direction
Without Pawar’s authority, the party risks factionalism at a time when it faces strong challenges from both national and regional rivals.
Political analysts warn that leadership uncertainty could weaken the NCP’s negotiating position ahead of future elections.
A Career of Political Shocks
Throughout his career, Ajit Pawar was known for his ability to reshape political narratives overnight.
Whether through surprise government formations, strategic resignations, or unexpected alliances, he repeatedly demonstrated his capacity to alter the political equation.
This unpredictability made him both respected and feared across party lines.
“Even his critics acknowledged his political instincts,” said a senior political observer. “He understood Maharashtra’s power structure better than most.”
Public and Political Reactions
Leaders from across parties have expressed condolences, describing Pawar as a “formidable force” in state politics.
Supporters gathered in large numbers in Baramati and Mumbai to pay tribute, reflecting his enduring popularity among rural and cooperative sector communities.
The state government has announced official mourning and plans to honour his contributions.
Our Thoughts
Ajit Pawar’s death marks the end of an era in Maharashtra politics. He represented a rare blend of grassroots leadership and high-level strategy, capable of influencing both village-level networks and state-wide power dynamics.
His absence will not be easy to fill. In the short term, political instability and internal rivalries are likely. In the long term, his legacy will shape how alliances and leadership structures evolve.
For the NCP and the ruling coalition, the challenge now is to manage transition without losing public confidence