Congress Must Apologize for ‘Hindu Terrorism’ Conspiracy: Fadnavis Following Malegaon Verdict
Mumbai | July 31, 2025 — Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis today criticized the Congress party for allegedly constructing a narrative equating Hinduism with terrorism—calling it a political conspiracy and demanding an apology in the aftermath of the Malegaon bomb blast case verdict.
Fadnavis stated the Congress-led UPA government had systematically portrayed Hindus as terrorists, a claim that has now been discredited by judicial ruling. “The court has shown how false that narrative was. Congress must apologize to every Hindu individual and the community as a whole,” he asserted to reporters.
Blaming the System, Not the Police
Fadnavis went on to clarify that his criticism targets the political narrative—not law enforcement agencies. He emphasized they were merely “under pressure” during a post‑9/11 climate when theories of Islamic terrorism dominated global discourse.
“Terrorism was never saffron, is not, and will never be,” Fadnavis declared.
He framed the verdict as vindication for those wrongly implicated, and a repudiation of the so-called “saffron terror” label engineered during the UPA era.
Bawankule Calls Vindication of Hindu Faith
Revenue Minister Chandrashekhar Bawankule described the verdict as more than judicial—it is an exposure of a political conspiracy designed to defame Hindus.
He highlighted the court's findings that none of the allegations against the accused stood up to evidentiary scrutiny. He added:
“By using terms like ‘Hindu terrorism,’ Congress demeaned a religion historically known for tolerance and humanity.”
He echoed the call for an apology to the Hindu community for this perceived defamation.
Nitesh Rane: A Setback to Defamation Strategy
Ports and Shipping Minister Nitesh Rane slammed what he called a decades-long attempt to falsely frame Hindutva leaders under terrorism charges. He claimed:
“This verdict is a major slap to those who tried to defame the Hindu community. The color of terrorism is green—not saffron.”
Rane asserted that such cases are no longer feasible under the current pro-Hindutva governments and urged Congress leaders to publicly repent—saying they need to go to temple and apologize.
BJP Spokesman Accuses Congress of Orchestrated Persecution
Maharashtra BJP spokesperson Keshav Upadhye insisted the verdict dismantles a conspiracy devised by Congress to forge a false “saffron terror” narrative. He cited the acquittal of seven accused—including Sadhvi Pragya Singh, Col. Purohit, and others—who had allegedly undergone “inhumane torture” for coerced confessions.
According to Upadhye:
“This was a long-planned effort by Congress to suppress Hindutva activists and present them as terrorists, all for political advantage.”
Shinde Targets P. Chidambaram’s Role in Narrative Building
Shiv Sena MP Shrikant Shinde directed criticism at former Union Home Minister P. Chidambaram, who he claims tried steering the "saffron terrorism" storyline:
“Chidambaram questioned whether Indian citizens could be terrorists while ignoring clear evidence of terrorism from Pakistan. Today, the truth is out.”
Shinde said this verdict brings long-overdue closure to those wrongfully accused under what he called a politically motivated trope.
Background: The Malegaon Blast Case and ‘Saffron Terror’ Allegations
The 2008 Malegaon blast triggered national outrage and implicated several Hindu nationalist activists, including Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt. Col. Prasad Shrikant Purohit. The investigation spanned years, with many accused in jail for over a decade, amid widespread allegations of coerced statements and investigative bias.
The term "Hindu terrorism" or “saffron terror” emerged during the UPA years, gaining traction through political commentary and media coverage despite limited legal validation. Several persons accused under the label were later acquitted, culminating in today’s landmark ruling.
Why It Matters: National Impact and Political Fallout
The court verdict has triggered strong reactions not only in Maharashtra but across political and civic spaces. It rekindles debates on minority-versus-majority narratives, state authority over civil liberties, and the weaponization of terrorism charges for political ends.
CM Fadnavis and BJP leaders see the judgment as symbolic reaffirmation for majoritarian voices and Hindutva ideology, and a blow to Congress’s historical opposition strategy. However, critics warn of heightened communal polarization as political leaders seize on the verdict for broader messaging.
Final Thoughts from TheTrendingPeople.com
The Malegaon ’saffron terror’ verdict has reopened wounds of political manipulation and communal stereotyping. While the acquittal underscores the importance of legal due process, the public uproar reflects deep mistrust in institutions. As demands for a formal apology gather steam, India confronts a painful question: Should political expediency overrule constitutional ethics?
Let today’s judgment serve as both closure for the accused and caution for political parties—truth, once buried, often resurfaces with unstoppable force.